The ATS that shows its work

See who’s actually good.And why.

Curriculo reads what a candidate actually built, rates it 0 to 100, and writes out the reasoning behind the number. Your team reviews the argument before anyone moves a stage.

Built for teams that hire on evidence

Illustrative placeholder marks

How scoring works

Every score arrives with the case that produced it.

Keyword tools count words on a resume. Curriculo reads the work and writes the argument.

  • It reads the actual work

    The file they shipped is the input, not the resume keywords.

    • Portfolios and repositories
    • Case studies and writing
    • Role-weighted evidence
    • Score attribution by file
  • Every score is argued

    A number between 0 and 100, with the written case under it.

    • What counted
    • What did not
    • Where evidence thinned
    • Forwardable as-is
  • One pipeline, not two

    Applicants, stages, notes, and email in one place.

    • Shared stages
    • Thread beside the candidate
    • No shadow spreadsheet
    • Visible the moment it changes

Outcomes

Scores you can read.
Reasons you can forward.

Signals

0–100

The range every score lands in.

100%

Of scores carry reasoning.

Placeholder quote. This is the shape a customer sentence takes once one is cleared.
Placeholder nameRole, Company

Placeholder testimonials and figures — prototype only

How it works

Six agents.One pipeline.

01

Ingest

Applications, resumes and portfolio links land in one pipeline, from every source you already post to.

  • Boards, referrals and direct
  • Resume and portfolio parsing
  • One pipeline for each role

How it works

Six agents.One pipeline.

01

Ingest

Applications, resumes and portfolio links land in one pipeline, from every source you already post to.

  • Boards, referrals and direct
  • Resume and portfolio parsing
  • One pipeline for each role
02

Evidence

It opens what the candidate actually built and reads the work itself, not just the claims on the resume.

  • Opens repos and live links
  • Reads the work, not the claim
  • Marks what it cannot verify
03

Score

Every candidate gets a 0-100 score with the written reasoning behind it, so you can check the logic.

  • 0-100 with written reasoning
  • Same rubric for everyone
  • Every step is inspectable
04

Decide

Shortlist, schedule and move people forward, with the evidence attached to every decision.

  • Shortlist straight from score
  • Scheduling built in
  • Evidence rides with the call

The agents

They pass the hire along.

Mail in. A score. A slot on the calendar. A note for the manager. Six agents, one file moving through the desk.

Our solutions

AI agnostic by design

Curriculo ATS MCP plugs into the AI you already use. The agents run the hiring work without locking you into a vendor or a chat.

Testimonials

Hiring teams, on the record

Founders, agencies, and talent leads who needed the score and the reason in the same place.

Studio founder

The score came with the why

Rating

Comment

We stopped arguing about gut feel. The file showed why someone scored 72, and we hired from that.

Search firm

Desk work in one pipeline

Rating

Comment

Mail, a score, and a slot on the calendar sit in one file. The desk does not split across four tools.

Talent lead

Reasoning outlives the hire

Rating

Comment

A month later I can still open the hire and read the argument. That is the record, not a chat thread.

Hiring manager

Shortlist without a spreadsheet

Rating

Comment

I get a ranked list with the evidence attached. I do not rebuild the case in a sheet before the panel.
Illustrative placeholder marks

Frequently asked questions